Key Takeaways from ISR’s Global Survey on Cuts to Climate and Weather Data in US
by ISR Staff

The US government is rapidly scaling back the collection, analysis, and availability of federal climate and weather datasets and systems. In the summer of 2025, the ISR surveyed its 20,000 members to better understand how these changes may impact researchers and experts across sectors, disciplines, and geographies.
At the International Science Reserve, we want to understand the perspective of those who live and work outside of the US, but have relied on America’s “gold standard” climate and weather data and modeling for their own research.
Survey respondents represented a variety of sectors and disciplines. Most that responded identified that they worked either in a professional sector (40%), such as emergency management or advising a municipality on disaster response—or are currently conducting research in a university setting (40%). Their expertise ranged throughout many disciplines, but environmental science, data science, and social science were some of the top areas of focus.
Here are three major takeaways from the survey:
1) Data cuts to US climate and weather data are already impacting researchers’ work.
When asked whether changes to US federal climate and weather data in 2025 caused them to discontinue or significantly scale back this project, about 20% of participants said that their work was already impacted.
The US has historically made data open and freely available to the world.
One survey respondent, Dr. Fulya Aydin-Kandemir, a climate scientist and senior expert at the Climate Change and Zero Waste Department of Antalya Metropolitan Municipality in Türkiye, told the ISR that the global climate modeling system has benefited from the US open-source system:
“We use many global data sources. But for decades, institutions like NASA and NOAA have set the global standard for Earth observation and climate science—providing a foundation upon which agencies like the European Space Agency (ESA) and The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) have also built their own impressive capabilities. Thanks to that legacy, we all became stronger in fighting climate change — together.”

2) The majority of respondents were unsure about where they would go to replace US data given it has been the “gold standard” for decades.
At the time of the survey in May and June 2025, nearly 60% of experts that responded were unsure where they would go to replace high-quality data. News reports have documented that scientists and citizens around the world are practicing “guerilla archiving,” meaning that they are downloading the existing databases before they are taken offline.
Dr. Aydin-Kandemir noted that in a 2024 study of precipitation and snow cover analysis in the Central Taurus Mountains in southern Turkey, she found that US Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), which has measured global rainfall for nearly three decades, outperformed European data in their study areas. “It wasn’t about preference—it was about what worked for our region. These datasets helped us uncover real signals of climate change.”
Recent reporting by Reuters in August found that the EU and European governments are planning new initiatives that mirror or possibly end their dependency on United States scientific data sets.
3) The biggest concern for researchers is long-term gaps in climate modeling and data.
Most experts who participated in the survey identified that the US cuts could lead to long-term consequences for understanding climate change and adequately preparing communities to for the impacts of climate change. Additionally, less accurate extreme weather and reduced trust were also identified as top concerns among respondents.

Dr. Aydin-Kandemir went on to tell the ISR, “If the U.S. cuts off access to these datasets, it’s not just a technical loss—it’s a loss of trust, of global cooperation, and of motivation. These tools represent decades of shared scientific progress. They make our work possible. In the face of the climate crisis, we need more collaboration—not isolation.”
Whether or not you responded to our survey or are directly impacted, your perspective matters to the International Science Reserve.
If you are an ISR member, please join us on the Digital Hub Discussion to further discuss your concerns and the potential consequences of cuts to US climate and weather data. Your perspective will help inform future programming, advocacy, and community support.